相约星期六
52个文明项目同台竞技 基层善治点亮杭城_我的网站

A | 夸夸会、小哥圆桌会、青年实践课堂……每日商报讯 “送你一朵小红花,开在你心底最深的泥沙……”伴着温柔的歌声,建德市杨村桥镇互助长宁片区新时代文明实践总站负责人夏云走上2026年杭州市新时代文明实践项目展示交流活动的舞台,带来了乡村善治样板项目“夸夸会”的生动分享。长宁村曾是典型空心村,青壮年常年外出经营草莓产业,村内留守老人居多,日常缺少陪伴照料。

B | 2022年,立足村内传承70年的互助传统,创新推出“夸夸会”特色载体,以邻里互相夸赞的温情形式激活民间善意,搭建起群众说事、邻里点赞、互帮互助、榜样引领的基层治理闭环。“除每季一场集中夸夸会,我们配套建立每月互助日、村级互助洗衣房等常态化服务,同步推出积分兑换、村民荣誉馆、大中小三级互助圈长效保障机制。”夏云介绍,项目落地四年以来,全村累计挖掘好人好事270余件,曾经负债、治理薄弱的村庄,如今蜕变为片区善治示范标杆。“夸夸会”的暖心故事,是杭州全域新时代文明实践创新探索的鲜活缩影。 By Wang Gaofei, Wu Xinru (ECNS) -- Do sunflower seeds and dumplings pose a "threat" to U.S. national security? The question may sound absurd, but the latest additions to the so-called Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) entity list have raised questions about the breadth of the U.S. trade restrictions on Chinese goods. 43 Chinese companies have been added to the list in a single day, bringing the total to 187. From advanced chips to food and everyday apparel, the overreaching "big stick" of U.S. sanctions has finally ripped away its own fig-leaf. Is this move really driven by "human rights concerns" as the West claimed, or is it merely the result of political calculation by Washington's elites? What lies behind Washington's decision to escalate sanctions just one day after reaching a consensus? Josef Gregory Mahoney, an American scholar and professor of Politics and International Relations at East China Normal University, was recently invited to join News Lounge of China News Network where he unpacked the real intentions of U.S. sanctions. Sunflower seeds and dumplings land on the list: The absurdity and futility behind overreaching sanctions "This move is logically indefensible," Mahoney stated bluntly, "These consumer goods firms have absolutely no connection to the so-called 'forced labor' allegations. Claims are entirely fabricated and lack any factual basis." He argued that the U.S.' true intention is clear -- using groundless excuses to suppress China's competitive ordinary industries, disrupt the stability of China's industrial and supply chains, and protect the market share of its own traditional industries at the expense of Chinese enterprises' legitimate rights. When even sunflower seeds and dumplings are labeled as "threats," the veteran scholar of China-U.S. relations emphasized, it exposes the absurdity and desperation behind Washington's containment strategy. Turning to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) itself, he was even more incisive: "In the context of international law, the UFLPA has no legitimate legal foundation. In fact, it violates basic WTO rules and international trade norms." He also added that the enforcement criteria of UFLPA are fatally flawed, adopting an unfair, rebuttable presumption that treats all related entities as guilty without evidence. When the law arbitrarily expands restrictions without clear, consistent judgment, it reverses the fundamental legal principle of presumption of innocence. To suppress China, Washington has disregarded legal principles and fallen into logical contradictions, going to extraordinary lengths to achieve its ends. Mahoney stressed: "It is blatant economic coercion, which could bring far-reaching harm," including erecting unnecessary trade barriers, hindering the flow of bilateral goods, and disrupting global industrial chain arrangements. Washington will hardly be able to bear the bitter fruits of these spillover effects. Backtracking the very next day: Political calculation trumps economic and trade consensus Just one day before the sanctions were announced, senior Chinese and U.S. officials in charge of economic and trade affairs had just held a video call, during which both sides stated that they were ready to jointly push for stable and sound China-U.S. economic and trade ties. Yet Washington brandished the big stick of sanctions almost immediately after those remarks. According to Mahoney, the timing is a deliberate and calculated provocation. "The U.S. uses engagement and escalation as two sides of the same policy. It aims to create unilateral leverage before the follow-up consultations, break the mutual trust just built and force China into unnecessary concessions, completely violating the consensus reached by both parties." The so-called "human rights concerns" appear to be a plausible pretext by the U.S. Yet in Mahoney's eyes, the sanction escalation stems almost entirely from domestic U.S. political calculation. As the midterm elections draw near, demonstrating toughness on China remains one of the few tactics to unite Washington's bitterly-divided political establishment. The U.S. Congress has consistently demanded more aggressive UFLPA enforcement, and expanding the entity list helps insulate the White House from criticism by China Hawks. Mahoney sees through this ploy: "It says nothing more than a convenient political fig leaf." But just how much of Washington's shame can this fig leaf possibly cover? Mahoney pointed directly to long-unresolved domestic issues in the United States, including sweatshop labor, prison labor and the abuse of migrant labor. Abroad, Washington has resorted to the aggression against Venezuela, against Iran, and supporting the genocide in Gaza. Plagued by deep-seated domestic ills and a dismal human rights record, Washington, though, has long posed as a self-appointed "world's policeman," but its actions only serve to expose its deep hypocrisy. Mahoney warned that, faced with election-driven pressures, continued festering of domestic governance problems in the U.S. could push Washington toward increasingly radical foreign policy stances. This sanction move, which represents a betrayal of previous consensus, has further eroded the already fragile China-U.S. mutual trust and introduced considerable uncertainties for subsequent high-level consultations. Truth long obscured: Heavy barriers hide the reality Western public discourse has long been awash with various false narratives targeting China, Xinjiang in particular. "One of the interesting things we know about the cotton industry in Xinjiang is that there's no 'forced labor,' period. One of the things that is sort of interesting is that anyone can go to Xinjiang. It welcomes all visitors." Mahoney iterated in the interview. During his recent visit to Xinjiang, Mahoney not only witnessed firsthand the highly-mechanized cotton-harvesting operations, but also toured local factories that produce harvesting equipment. Inside the production workshops, he saw working teams led by female engineers, and members included Uyghurs who were there as professionals. Everyone performed their respective duties, actively contributing ideas and energy to production with great enthusiasm. Nowhere did he see "forced labor" or "slave labor" decried in Western media narratives. Only by experiencing it firsthand and verifying through on-the-ground investigation can one get a glimpse of the truth. Mahoney noted that foreign visitors traveling to Urumqi, Karamay, and Kashgar are consistently struck by the region's stability, public order, and the well-being of its people. Not everyone can afford, unfortunately, to travel to China, as Mahoney introduced, especially many Americans who find their position eroding economically because of the very policies that the current administration is putting into place. "They're kind of trapped in economic decline." Some anti-China forces have long engaged in blame-shifting, seeking to externalize domestic governance conflicts and divert public discontent through media narratives. Trapped within pre-set information echo chambers, ordinary citizens lack the means to verify the truth by traveling to China. Exposed over time to one-sided, misleading and even false reports, they readily develop deep-seated negative stereotypes about China. Encouragingly, the current media landscape is quietly shifting. Mahoney noticed that a level of criticality has sort of entered the discussion now, which is creating an opening for people to take a more balanced look at China. In recent years, China has rolled out multiple visa-exemption policies, and the popularity of travelling to China continues to surge. In his view, this offers an excellent opportunity for people overseas to break free from false narratives and see a multifaceted, authentic China. At the end of the interview, Mahoney shared his observations on the future development of China-U.S. relations. In his view, how relations unfold between these two major powers has implications well beyond the two nations but also the global order. Mahoney explained how Europe, faced with persistently high risks of deindustrialization, is further impacted by the energy crisis amid regional conflicts stoked by the United States, such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the Iran-Israel conflict. A large volume of opportunities and investment therefore has flowed outward, forcing Europe to adopt trade-protectionist stances toward China, which brings complications to China's relationship with the EU. Mahoney said that a growing number of countries are seeing these developments. And they realize that if they want to avoid the boot heel of American hegemony, they have to find more constructive alternatives and the ability to advance according to their own agendas. "And these, in fact, are the alternatives that China is offering them." He held that some significant headwinds would be raised for the short-term development of China-U.S. relations and they would become more complicated. His position is that the United States is facing a relative decline and is being hollowed out from within by itself while still being engaged in imperial overreach globally. Increasingly, the world is building alternatives to that type of U.S. dominated model. On the contrary, China is probably the country best-positioned in the world to weather those types of risks and to even moderate them to some extent. He believes the country will work through this. "China has been a responsible major power that has committed itself to stability over conflict," said Mahoney. "If the U.S. can wake up to that realization, while at the same time figure out a way to change its behavior and commitment to structural inequalities, then I think we might find the two countries being able to move together in a way that would better result in a shared future for humanity," he concluded.
。在昨天的2026年杭州市新时代文明实践项目展示交流活动中,52个辨识度高、紧贴文明实践阵地建设的入围项目进行展示交流。这些项目聚焦学习实践科学理论、宣传宣讲党的政策、丰富活跃文化生活、培育践行主流价值等重点工作,构建起包含理论宣讲、助力共富、移风易俗、暖心服务、优质文化资源直达基层在内的多元内容体系,充分展示杭州市新时代文明实践工作的生动实践与亮眼成效。

C | 外卖小哥、“小哥圆桌会”发起人彭清林介绍,上城区“小哥圆桌会”文明善治项目。

D | 聚焦外卖骑手、快递员等新就业群体急难愁盼,由骑手自发组建自治议事平台,每月开展圆桌座谈,联动人社、公安、城管、工会等多部门面对面倾听诉求、解决难题。“最近高温天,我们聚焦小哥爱心驿站,配备直饮水、制冰机、环保饮水物资落实高温关怀。

E | ”青少年社会实践赛道同样亮点纷呈。

F | 杭报集团带来了“文明实践真有样——我在文明实践阵地过寒暑假”主题活动的分享,杭州日报记者、项目负责人之一王泽英介绍:“杭州日报一直深耕青少年社会实践领域。2024年底,‘青爱的杭州’大学生社会实践联盟正式成立。”在吴山广场文明实践点位,特殊教育学校学生为社区老人开展推拿志愿服务,学子坦言在校苦练两年技能,终于有机会实实在在服务群众,朴素话语尽显青年志愿初心;文明阵地同样成为中外文化交流窗口,西湖区金鱼井社区连续第三年落地“中美十万强”文化交流活动,70余名中外师生走进现代化社区,沉浸式感受中国式现代化建设实景,向外生动讲述杭州发展故事……“短短两年,联盟吸纳全国28个省区市148所高校、2600余支实践团队、7万余名大学生参与,充分盘活寒暑假青年力量。”王泽英说。近年来,杭州市持续深化新时代文明实践体系建设,坚持以项目化引领,推动文明实践向精准化、常态化、便利化、品牌化迈进。下一步,杭州将持续发掘基层优质文明实践载体,孵化培育并广泛推广一批群众喜闻乐见、具备较强社会影响力的特色项目,持续深耕“浙江有礼・最美杭州”市域文明新实践品牌,让文明新风浸润杭城每一处角落。

G |
Current article:http://aswe9k1.linxiuhuaishuangniuzhenrua.bond/9u2x/nr97aq.html
Published on:21:02:47
